Why is SOC Certification Becoming a Mandatory Requirement in Vendor Screening?
By Matayo AI Solutions Pvt Ltd 13-12-2025 91
Modern companies are heavily dependent on third-party SaaS platforms, cloud service providers, data processors, and information technology outsourcing partners. While this accelerates innovation, it also significantly widens the attack surface. As a result, enterprises have tightened their vendor risk frameworks, making SOC certification one of the most significant prerequisites for onboarding any technology vendor.
Growing importance of SOC certification in vendor screening
SOC-certified reports provide indirect visibility into the vendors' internal security controls and data-handling processes. With increasing cyber threats and regulatory pressures, the transverse level is no longer optional; it is essential.
Requirement for strong internal controls
With the rising number of cyberattacks on supply chain vendors, it has become the most exploited weakness in International Security architecture. These cyber attacks are infiltrating companies through third-party applications or service providers with weak security controls. Therefore, organisations are demanding a SOC 2 compliance certificate before granting vendor access to the sensitive system. The SOC 2 evaluates firewall and network segmentation, access controls for provisioning and deprovisioning of the automation, encryption of sensitive life-cycle management, SIEM-based log correlation and anomaly detection, vulnerability management, and the orchestration of security patches. These controls ensure that vendors enforce deterministic security configurations instead of temporary or reactive policies.
Closing Supply chain vulnerabilities in API and cloud integration
Without strong governance, this integration has become a high-risk vector. SOC mandate ensures that vendors implement a secure API design pattern, such as RBAC, OAuth 2.0, or MTLS. Followed by cloud workload protection controls through CSPM, CWPP, and IAM hardening, then endpoint integrity scrutiny, runtime monitoring, and zero-trust network policies, along with least-privilege architecture. This technical safeguard minimizes the risk of lateral movement and prevents advisors from exploiting weak integration points.
Regulatory alignment through audible and visible control
Governments and regulators require proven security governance. SOC 2 provides quantifiable audit evidence that the vendor has measurable, enforced, and continuously monitored controls. SOC 2 compliance certification includes cryptography controls organized to meet industry standards such as NIST, FIPS, and 140-2. The incident response metrics with time-bound escalation workflows, data retention, destruction, and sanitisation procedures to monitor SLAs aligned with regulatory timeframes. Structured evidence simplifies regulatory audits and helps enterprises meet compliance obligations when data operations are outsourced.
Enhancing service reliability and operational continuity
Modern saas infrastructure heavily depends on distributed cloud microservices and security protocols. Any vendor outage has a direct impact on the enterprise operations. During the SOC 2 compliance audit, auditors can evaluate high-availability clusters and their architectures, as well as backup rotation policies and immutable storage. SLO-driven monitoring focuses on latency, resource saturation, and throughput. DR drills, fault injection, and chaotic testing practices are also included. These controls focus on demonstrating that vendors can maintain continuity during infrastructure failures, cyberattacks, and scaling events.
Accelerating enterprise procurement and security review
Company procurement teams have replaced lengthy Security questionnaires with SOC 2 reports because they provide a strategic, independent overview of the vendor's security posture. SOC mandatereduces onboarding collisions by eliminating redundant security assessments, giving validity evidence for risk-scoring algorithms, demonstrating mature operational governance, and shortening contract cycles for SaaS and cloud vendors. For security vendors that are not SOC 2 compliant, instant disqualification due to security risk evaluation is common.
Conclusion
With the rise in cyber risk, organisations in complex cities cannot rely solely on vendor promises. SOC 2 certification provides verifiable evidence that vendors have implemented a strict infrastructure that cannot be penetrated to enforce continuous monitoring. To streamline SOC readiness, automate evidence collection, and operationalize continuous compliance, communicate with Matayo, the advanced security automation and governance intelligence company.
